Monday, January 27, 2020

No Post of ASI existed at the time of completion of 20 years of service. Personnel Entitled to Pay Grade of SI

In the case of Sunil Kumar Tyagi vs Union of India WP (3549/2018) the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi held that the CAPF personnel was entitled to the higher pay grade since the post of ASI did not exist at the time when the personnel became eligible for the MACP Benefits.

The relevant part of the judgment is reproduced as below:-

"3. As regards the fixing of the correct pay scale of the Petitioner, it is seen
that in BSF/General Duty, there is no post of ASI/General Duty in the pay
scale of Rs.4000-100-6000 (pre-revised) which had been converted into Pay
Band-I i.e. 5200-20200 in the grade pay of Rs.2800 having pay band of
8560 with the total pay (basic pay) of Rs.11360. Thus, in the case of the
Petitioner, the second financial upgradation was required to be given in the
pay scale of Rs.5500-9000 (pre-revised). Since this was not granted to other
similarly placed as the Petitioner, writ petitions were filed in this Court. A
series of judgments have been passed by this Court in those writ petitions, as
a result of which the Respondents extended the benefit of financial
upgradation in the pay scale of Rs.5500-9000 to all personnel who had
completed 24 years of regular service during the period 9th August, 1999 to
31st August, 2008."


The judgment was challenged by the Union of India before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (civil) Diary No. 35888/2019 but the same was dismissed by the Hon'ble Apex Court on 15.11.2019.

The judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi dealt with three issues.

One regarding the fixation of appropriate pay scale

Secondly, with regard to the applicability of the scheme from the completion of 20 years of service/01.01.2006

Thirdly regarding the grant of ACP on completion of 12 years i.e. wef Oct 1999 and not 30th Dec 2000.

The writ petition was allowed and the prayers were granted.

Personal observations of the author

It has been my experience that the CAPF Department has been stalling/delaying the benefits to the personnel on one pretext or the others and personnel with eligible cases are being made to approach the court in writ petitions.

The same could have been avoided if the judgments of this Hon'ble Court/Apex Court were treated as precedents.

WHETHER MACP IS APPLICABLE FROM 01.09.2008 OR 01.01.2006???????


Modified Career Progression Scheme was recommended by the 6th Pay Commission IN PARA 6.1.15 of its report. As per the recommendations, financial upgradation will be available in the next higher pay grade whenever an employee has completed 12 years continuous service in the same grade.

The Government of India considered the recommendations of the 6th Central Pay Commission for the introduction of the MACPS and accepted the samw with further modification to grant three upgradations under the MACPS at the intervals of 10, 20 and 30 years of continuous regular service.

Refer:- OM No. 35034/3/2008-Estt.(D) dated 19.05.2009

Although, as per the recommendation of the 6th Pay Commission, the benefits of the scheme for the MACP were to accrue from 01.01.2006, the scheme was made applicable wef 01.09.2008 by the Government of India.

The issue came before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India vs Balbir Singh Civil Diary no. 3744 of 2016.

It was held as below:-

"11. We are only concerned with the interpretation of the Resolution of the Government which clearly states that the recommendations of 6th CPC as modified and accepted by the Central Government in so far as they relate to pay structure, pay scales, grade pay etc. will apply from 01.01.2006. There may be some gainers and some losers but the intention of the Government was clear that this Scheme which is part of the pay structure would apply from 01.01.2006. We may also point out that the Resolution dated 30.08.2008 whereby the recommendation of the Pay Commission has been accepted with modifications and recommendations with regard to pay structure, pay scales, grade pay etc. have been made applicable from 01.01.2006. This is a decision of the Cabinet. This decision could not have been modified by issuing executive instruction. The letter dated 30.05.2011 flies in the face of the Cabinet decision reflected in the Resolution dated 30.08.2008. Thus, administrative instruction dated 30.05.2011 is totally ultra vires the Resolution of the Government."